首頁
   
英文姓氏 P
1. Pellikaan-Engel, Maja E., Philosophy Educating Humanity? (哲學化育人文?)
   Over two millennia of Western philosophy has not yet contributed much to the education of humanity. Philosophy has almost always been the exclusive domain of a small group of men. This elite character makes the assumption that philosophy could contribute to the education of human beings towards humanity — a humanity of human rights — improbable. If we want to educate human beings towards humanity, we will first have to teach them a sense of responsibility. The power of persuasion needed in order to teach such a sense of responsibility requires that we demonstrate our involvement in and co-responsibility for their concrete problems by presenting clear analyses of these problems and by setting a good example wherever possible. One of the most universal and concrete problems of life is the issue of procreation. As regards this issue, however, philosophers have failed miserably: they themselves have often exhibited irresponsible procreation and have, in fact, only recently begun to consider the issue a subject for philosophy. I will try to analyze when a decision to procreate or abort may be called responsible and whether and to what extent the applications of modern techniques such as in vitro fertilization are in line with our views of human rights.(參閱網址
2. Platt, Thomas., Medicine, Metaphysics and Morals (醫學, 形上學與道德)
   Moral decisions concerning what ought to be done always assume metaphysical presuppositions concerning the way the world is. In the field of biomedical ethics, some of the metaphysical presuppositions underlying many current discussions of issues of life and death seem particularly implausible. These include our assumption of the reality of social atomism and our beliefs relating to the possibility of autonomy. Given the implausibility of these two assumptions, many discussions have focused our attention on the wrong issues by reducing questions of alternative social practices to questions of individual preferences. Far from facilitating intelligent solutions to our problems, this merely clouds the issues involved.(參閱網址
3. Professor Martin Bobrow, The Patient’s Consent
  參閱網址
依出版類型分類
依作者英文姓氏分類
A B C D E F G H I J K L M
N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
依作者中文姓氏筆劃分類
依關鍵字分類
Zaner講座 中山哲學所 本網頁由 行政院衛生署「臨床倫理諮商本土化模式之運用與評估:情境倫理的臨床實踐」
(Practicing and Evaluating the Indigenous Model of Clinical Ethical Consultation : Clinical Practice of Situated Ethics)計畫經費贊助
TEL: +886-7-3121101ext.6831 FAX: +886-7-313-5944
E-mail: ethic9707@gmail.com